• Home
  • GRC Lists
  • GRC Vendors
  • Archives
  • About
  • Sitemap
amuDee.com
Unified GRC, Security, Gadgets, News and Media
  • GRC & Security
    • Access Controls
    • Compliance regulations
    • Enterprise Risk Management
    • Network System Security
      • Twitter Security
      • Vulnerabilities
    • SAP Security
      • SAP Basis
    • Troubleshooting GRC
  • Guest Lounge
    • Gadgets & Technology
      • Technology Sneak Peaks
      • Tips & Tricks
  • My Epitomization
    • Twitter Digest
  • News & Media
    • Avarice News Makers
  • Subscribe
Browse: Home / section 404

section 404

Impact of SOX on non American companies

By Amol Bharti on February 1, 2009

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) impacts directly on companies that are listed on the US stock exchanges, but it has standard setting implications for any company that may go pubic or that might be acquired by a public company. I was recently contacted by an Australia based Business Analyst whose company is getting privatized with 50% [...]

Posted in Compliance regulations | Tagged 11 titles, 2002 act, clause 49, cobit, cobit 4.1, corporate accountability, coso, Impact of SOX on non American companies, pcaob, sarbanes oxley act of 2002, sarbox, sec, section 302, section 309, section 404, securities and exchange commission, Short note on Sarbanes Oxley, sox, trust, united states federal law | Leave a response

Section 302 – Disclosure and Section 404 – Internal Controls

By Amol Bharti on March 6, 2008

Ok so let’s start with SOX Sections related to Internal Controls and Disclosure. After the SOX legislation came into existenance, A significant amount of attention was given to Section 302 (Disclosure) and Section 404 (Internal Controls). Sarbanes-Oxley Sections 302 and 404 are specifically designed to ensure information required to be disclosed is initiated, processed, recorded, [...]

Posted in Compliance regulations | Tagged 11 titles, 2002 act, clause 49, cobit, cobit 4.1, corporate accountability, coso, disclosure, internal controls, pcaob, sarbanes oxley act of 2002, sarbox, sec, section 302, section 309, section 404, securities and exchange commission, sox, trust, united states federal law | Leave a response

Controls from SOX Perspective – Excerpts of discussion with Ankur Tandon

By Amol Bharti on January 16, 2008

Last Wednesday,  I had some healthy discussion with Ankur Tandon about his perspective on SOX and Internal Controls. Its’ been almost a week, that I was thinking about writing what we discussed on a busy scrum day. About Ankur Tandon: Ankur Tandon is a key developer of SAP Enterprise Risk management solution. He can be described as a person [...]

Posted in Compliance regulations | Tagged 11 titles, 2002 act, amol bharti, ankur tandon, clause 49, cobit, cobit 4.1, corporate accountability, coso, pcaob, sarbanes oxley act of 2002, sarbox, sec, section 302, section 309, section 404, securities and exchange commission, sox, sox discussion, SOX perspective, trust, united states federal law | Leave a response

Define an Internal Control

By Amol Bharti on November 14, 2007

An effective internal control is the basic foundation of safe and sound organizational financial policy. Internal control means different things to different people.

Posted in Compliance regulations | Tagged 11 titles, 2002 act, clause 49, cobit, cobit 4.1, corporate accountability, coso, define internal control, internal control, internal controls, pcaob, samples of financial control self assessment checklists, sarbanes oxley act of 2002, sarbox, sec, section 302, section 309, section 404, securities and exchange commission, sox, trust, united states federal law, what is an internal control | Leave a response

Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

By Amol Bharti on November 11, 2007

Posted on Nov 11, 2007 Summary: An effective internal control is the basic foundation of safe and sound organizational financial policy, indeed it’s now the law (Section 404 and Section 302 of SOX). This blog introduces you to Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 specifically covering Section 302 (Disclosure) and Section 404 (Internal Controls), COSO, COBIT Control framework. [...]

Posted in Compliance regulations | Tagged cobit, control framework, coso, disclosure, internal controls, public company accounting reform, sarbanes oxley act, sarbanes oxley act of 2002, sarbox, section 302, section 404, sox | Leave a response

  • Twitter
  • Top Blogs
  • Comments
  • SAP SDN

Twitter Updates

  • end of a perfect weekend. And a start of a perfect national holiday. Eid mubarak and happy ganesh chaturti 21 hrs ago
  • the best defense is not software, it's you. You have to practice safe Hex to prevent malicious software. 1 day ago
  • More updates...

Hottest Blogs

  • Vista's Security Rendered Completely Useless by New Exploit
  • (10875)
  • You can post your precious e-blessings here!!
  • (2607)
  • Dollar-Rupee relationship amidst current financial slowdown
  • (2194)
  • GetyTV YouTube Downloader for Windows Mobile Pocket PC - Freeware
  • (1898)
  • SAP Security Notes - the deadly list
  • (1745)

Recent Comments

  • Fred van de Langenberg on Unpacking hundreds of SAP Support Packages in seconds
  • Amol Bharti on Unpacking hundreds of SAP Support Packages in seconds
  • Snowy on Unpacking hundreds of SAP Support Packages in seconds
  • Amol Bharti on Institute of Engineering & Technology, Bhaddal – Social Media Networking
  • Abhishek Sharma on Institute of Engineering & Technology, Bhaddal – Social Media Networking

RSS SAP SDN Contributions

  • Re: What are the backgroundjobs we schedule in grc - by Amol Bharti
  • Re: Assigning Existing FF IDs to Existing Users. - by Amol Bharti
  • Re: long runtime for FULL_SYNC Job for Users and Roles - by Amol Bharti
  • Re: Authentication for SSO. - by Amol Bharti
  • Re: what are the roles & responsibilities of GRC/SECURTIY CONSULTANT IN IMPLE - by Amol Bharti

Categories

  • Access Controls
  • Avarice News Makers
  • Compliance regulations
  • Enterprise Risk Management
  • Gadgets & Technology
  • GRC & Security
  • Guest Lounge
  • My Epitomization
  • Network System Security
  • News & Media
  • SAP Basis
  • SAP Security
  • Technology Sneak Peaks
  • Tips & Tricks
  • Troubleshooting GRC
  • Twitter Digest
  • Twitter Security
  • Vulnerabilities

Exclusive Blogs

  • Handling emergency with SAP BusinessObjects Superuser Privilege Management

  • Vista’s Security Rendered Completely Useless by New Exploit

  • PortQry.exe a better alternative to Ping, Telnet, tracert

  • SAP Portal Security Guidelines

  • SAP Enterprise Portal Security

  • ‘HTTPOnly’ Flag In Cookie Not Set – SAP Portal

  • Security Alert: Fake twitter website

  • Sender Policy Framework - SPF Record

  • Want to become a SAP Security consultant?

  • Basel II’s Three Approaches to Operational Risk Management

  • Handling SOX compliance requirements in non-US (esp. Canadian) companies

  • Section 302 – Disclosure and Section 404 – Internal Controls

  • Operational Risk Management Awareness

  • Ten Key Technologies For Lean Process Improvement

  • The Weakest Link In Your Information Security Chain

  • Key Triggers for future Indian IT industry and Outsourcing

  • Network Utilities – Freeware

  • How to analyze passwords of all important users across SAP clients

  • What to do before your website gets Hacked

  • Understand Vandalism and Hacking – Open source CMS

  • The Dark side of IT

  • Role of a Security Consultant in an SAP implementation Project

  • 10 things you need to know to become an SAP Security Forensic Consultant

  • Important SAP Security Parameters

  • SAP default users and passwords

amudee.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India License | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer SAP®, Oracle®, Syntel®, Microsoft® are registered trademarks of the respective companies and affiliates in the U.S, Germany and other countries. All other trademarks mentioned on this blog or any document on the website are the property of their respective owners. Powered by WordPress